Test Event

Europe/Berlin
Description

Welcome to the ENBIS Test Event 

Data-Driven Innovation in Sustainable Manufacturing: Statistical Methods, Smart Systems, and Hybrid Approaches
Ljubljana, Slovenia, June 12–13, 2025

  • Thursday, 5 June
    • Fake Session
      • 1
        ONLINE MONITORING AND OPTIMIZATION OF REACTIVE EXTRUSION PROCESSES

        Online analysis has been widely developed to monitor the chemistry or the physics on batch or
        continuous processes. One of the major issues concerns the sampling part to integrate the analyt-
        ical solution into the process. Optical spectroscopy is one of the most used technologies as it can
        be implemented directly inline and does not necessary required a sampling loop to adapt the pro-
        cess to the analyzer. The main advantage is the possibility to use probes or flow cells that can be
        immerged directly into the process. A wide range of probes exists to be able to fit with the process
        conditions like the temperature, pressure, or rotation speed. The possibility of using optical fibers
        allows to deport the analyzer from the processes to protect the sensitive part of it.
        In the case of reactive extrusion processes, online analysis is not commonly used as the constraints
        have some difference from the classical batch or continuous processes. Harsh conditions like high
        temperature and pressure, melt product with high viscosity make sampling part challenging. Op-
        tical spectroscopy can monitor most of the reaction done inside an extruder and the objective here
        is to present how optical spectroscopy probes can be implemented directly inline. Reactive extru-
        sion like grafting onto a polymer, depolymerization or even homogeneous mixing of polymers are
        presented to demonstrate its interest.
        Online analysis into extruder can be used to do optimization of the process conditions to find the
        best quality product. An approach using near infrared spectroscopy, chemometrics tools like the
        PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and a design of experiments based on Bayesian optimization
        is also presented here. This approach allows to put in place self-optimization of the processes.

        Speaker: Lara Kuhlmann de Canaviri (Fachhochschule Dortmund)
      • 2
        Multiscale interval PLS for spectral data modeling

        Process analytic technologies (PAT) are routinely used to rapidly assess quality properties in many
        industrial sectors. The performance of PAT-based models is, however, highly related to their
        ability to pre-process the spectra and select key wavebands. Amongst the modeling methodolo-
        gies for PAT, partial least squares (PLS) (Wold, Sjöström and Eriksson, 2001) and interval partial
        least squares (iPLS) (Nørgaard et al., 2000) models coupled with well-known chemometric pre-
        processing approaches are the most widespread due to their ease of use and interpretability. As
        an alternative to classical pre-processing approaches, wavelet transforms (Mallat, 1989) provide a
        fast framework for feature extraction by convulsion of fixed filters with the original signal.
        The proposed Multiscale interval Partial Least Squares (MS-iPLS) methodology aims to combine
        the ability of wavelet transforms for feature extraction with those of iPLS for feature selection. To
        achieve this, MS-iPLS makes use of wavelet transforms to decompose the spectrum into wavelet
        coefficients at different time-frequency scales, and, afterward, the relevant wavelet coefficients
        are selected using either Forward addition or Backward elimination algorithms for iPLS. As the
        wavelet filters are linear, the MS-iPLS model can also be equivalently expressed in the original spec-
        tral domain, and thus, the standard PLS approaches can be applied for the sake of interpretability
        and feature analysis.
        In this study, 10 MS-iPLS models variants were constructed using five types of wavelet transforms
        and two iPLS selection algorithms and compared against 27 PLS benchmarks variants using differ-
        ent chemometric pre-processing and interval selection algorithms. The models were compared in
        two case studies, addressing a regression problem and a classification problem with real data.
        The results show that MS-iPLS models can either match or overcome the performance of the PLS
        benchmark models. For the regression problem, the PLS benchmark models were able to attain
        the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE), but their performance range was also wider, from an
        average RMSE of 0.11 (best model) to 2.46 (worst model), with most models being on the lower
        end. In contrast, the MS-iPLS models were consistently on the upper end, with an average RMSE
        ranging from 0.13 (best model) to 0.50 (worst model).
        In the classification problem, MS-iPLS attained the best performance with an average accuracy of
        92.7%, while the best PLS benchmark model had an average accuracy of 89.0%.
        Similarly to the PLS benchmarks models, MS-iPLS still requires an exhaustive search for the op-
        timal wavelet transform for each case study. However, with MS-iPLS the number of models to
        explore was significantly reduced (by a factor of 3, i.e., 1/3) without compromising on performance
        or interpretability.

        Speaker: Lara Kuhlmann de Canaviri (Fachhochschule Dortmund)
      • 3
        Defining process operating space under uncertainty: Bayesian Design Space for complex kinetic reactions

        Design of experiments for process scale-up can be described as a double-edged sword for the phar-
        maceutical industry: intensification of experiments expands the knowledge of the process (uncer-
        tainty reduction) but increases resource expenditure. On the other hand, moving forward without
        enough process understanding is the first stone in a path of deviations, lack of quality, and even
        safety concerns.
        In the past years, Bayesian sampling methodologies have surfaced to incorporate uncertainty and
        lead to better guided risk/optimal decision making in terms of process conditions, and reduction
        of required experiments. Utilizing Bayesian sampling for design space offers several significant
        advantages: First, it allows for the incorporation of prior knowledge, leading to more informed
        and efficient experimental designs [1]. Secondly, by continuously updating beliefs with new data,
        Bayesian sampling enables a dynamic and adaptive approach, enhancing the accuracy and reli-
        ability of results. This method also provides a rigorous framework for quantifying uncertainty,
        ensuring robust decision-making even in complex scenarios [2]. Additionally, Bayesian sampling
        can effectively identify the probability space with reduced experimental work, leading to an earlier
        definition of a Normalized Operating Range (NOR) within a scale-up approach to a pharmaceutical
        process.
        In this work, a batch gas generating process with 10 different reactions occurring (reagents, prod-
        ucts and by-products) is evaluated with the proposed Bayesian Design Space [1], with different pro-
        cess parameters defined (time, temperature, reagent“A”initial concentration and reagent/solvent
        “B”initial concentration) and consumption CQA’s required for the same process. The results showed
        that a reduced amount of experiment (less than 6) were required to achieve an acceptable NOR for
        the process, and the outcome allowed for a safe transfer to a higher volume unit (manufacturing)
        with all safety and quality requirements achieved.
        [1]–Kusumo, K. et al.,“Bayesian Approach to Probabilistic Design Space Characterization: A
        Nested Sampling Strategy”, I&EC research, 2019
        [2]–Kennedy, P. et al.,“Nested Sampling Strategy for Bayesian Design Space Characterization”
        ,
        Comp. Aided Chem. Eng., 2020

        Speaker: Lara Kuhlmann de Canaviri (Fachhochschule Dortmund)